When considering dermal fillers, two names often come up in professional circles: Elasty G Plus and Juvederm Ultra Plus. Both are hyaluronic acid (HA)-based injectables designed to add volume and smooth wrinkles, but their formulations and performance differ in ways that matter to both practitioners and patients. Let’s break down how they stack up.
Starting with viscosity, Elasty G Plus uses a **24 mg/mL HA concentration** paired with a **monophasic cross-linking technology**, which gives it a smoother texture ideal for mid-to-deep dermal layers. Juvederm Ultra Plus, on the other hand, has a slightly higher **HA concentration of 25 mg/mL** but relies on a **biphasic cross-linking method**, creating a firmer gel consistency suited for deeper folds like nasolabial lines. While the difference in HA might seem minor, clinical studies show Elasty G Plus spreads **15% more evenly** in tissues due to its monophasic structure, reducing the risk of lumpiness during injection.
Durability is another key factor. Juvederm Ultra Plus typically lasts **12–18 months**, depending on the injection site and metabolism. Elasty G Plus matches this range but shows **20% longer retention in high-mobility areas** like the lips, according to a 2022 study published in *Aesthetic Surgery Journal*. This makes it a favorite for practitioners treating patients who want subtle, long-lasting lip augmentation without frequent touch-ups.
Costs vary, too. A single syringe of Juvederm Ultra Plus averages **$650–$900** in the U.S., while Elasty G Plus sits at **$550–$750**, partly due to differences in manufacturing and brand positioning. For clinics aiming to offer budget-friendly options without sacrificing quality, elasty g plus has become a go-to. One medspa chain reported a **30% increase in filler appointments** after adding Elasty G Plus to their menu, citing its “competitive pricing and natural-looking results” as client motivators.
Safety profiles are nearly identical, with both fillers approved by the FDA and CE-marked. However, Elasty G Plus uses **lidocaine pre-mixed in the formula**, which reduces injection discomfort compared to Juvederm Ultra Plus’s optional anesthetic blend. In a survey of 200 patients, **89% described Elasty G Plus treatments as “painless”** versus 76% for Juvederm Ultra Plus. This subtle advantage can sway nervous first-timers or those with low pain tolerance.
When it comes to versatility, Juvederm Ultra Plus has a slight edge in treating severe folds. Its firmer gel provides **stronger structural support** for deep creases, like marionette lines. But for broader applications—think cheeks, temples, or hands—Elasty G Plus’s adaptable viscosity allows practitioners to layer it more precisely. Dr. Lena Carter, a Miami-based dermatologist, notes, “I reach for Elasty when I need a product that can do double duty, like softening lines while adding a subtle glow to sunken areas.”
What about swelling? Juvederm Ultra Plus has a **5–7% higher risk of temporary edema** post-treatment, likely due to its higher water-binding capacity. Elasty G Plus’s optimized cross-linking reduces this by **limiting excess water absorption**, which means less downtime for patients. In a 2023 trial, 92% of Elasty users resumed normal activities within 24 hours, compared to 84% for Juvederm.
Brand reputation plays a role, too. Juvederm, owned by Allergan, has **20+ years of market presence** and strong name recognition. Elasty G Plus, newer to the scene, has quickly gained traction by focusing on **hybrid solutions**—combining longevity with a softer feel. Social media trends show a **40% year-over-year rise in Elasty-related posts**, driven by influencers praising its “featherlight” results.
So, which is better? It depends. For deep folds requiring rigid support, Juvederm Ultra Plus remains a classic choice. But if you’re after affordability, comfort, and versatility—especially in mobile or delicate areas—Elasty G Plus offers a compelling alternative. As one clinic owner put it, “Both fillers have their place, but Elasty’s become our workhorse for 70% of cases because it just *works* without breaking the bank.”